Chris Thilk

Uncomfortable

Posted in A Brief Digression by CThilk on June 1, 2009

There are two things that should make you vaguely uncomfortable, like you’re walking some sort of line between sane and insane, legal and illegal, rational and completely irresponsible.

  1. You’re own ideas
  2. The ideas of your friends and co-workers

I’m not saying you need to act on those ideas – at least not all of them – but if you’re not walking the line between what’s acceptable and not in your thinking and surrounding yourself with like-minded people then you’re probably not doing anything truly innovative or interesting. There’s a rush when you brainstorm proposals that carry with them the possibility of either being fired or getting a raise.

Movie Journal: X-Men, X-Men 2: X-Men United, The Incredible Hulk, Iron Man

Posted in Movie Journal by CThilk on June 1, 2009

I went on a comic book movie binge with four of the best of the recent batch. I got the itch to watch the X-flicks back when Wolverine was coming out but didn’t get a chance to until now. And with the hype about Iron Man 2 building as pictures are released and all that I figured I’d include not only the original but also the other movie Tony Stark makes an appearance in.

Movie Journal: Star Trek

Posted in Movie Journal by CThilk on June 1, 2009

Finally got around to seeing the new Star Trek flick, directed by J.J. Abrams and starring a full cast of young stars and unknown lense flairs.

I won’t get into the plot too much in case there are some that still haven’t seen it. But the story is very well written and developed and actually gives the audience a lot to chew on, especially if you’re big on piecing together and mapping out in your mind the vagaries of time travel and such. All I’ll say is that the marketing campaign did a good job of selling the movie as it is.

What I like about the movie the most is that it’s respectful to the original series without feeling a need to overtly pay homage to it. We know these characters or at least are familiar with them and so it’s easy to get invested in them and the story they’re involved in, especially since the exposition is never delivered in an incredibly heavy-handed manner. Instead it gets sprinkled here and there among the action, with the audience expected to keep up, a rare assumption that there are intelligent people watching.

Movie Journal: High Fidelity

Posted in Movie Journal by CThilk on June 1, 2009

One of my favorite movies, both for its Chicago setting and for John Cusack’s fantastic performance. It’s so incredibly well written and it stands up so strongly from when it was released eight or nine years ago. Cusack’s line deliveries in particular always, always kill me and make me laugh out loud regardless of how many times I watch it.

Dow Jones Social Media Rules Make a Lot of Sense

Posted in Online, Social Media, Social Networking by CThilk on June 1, 2009

In the few weeks or so since their release, I’ve failed to see what about the guidelines for online activities by Dow Jones is provoking such a strong reaction from social media types. While I might not agree 100% with with all of them I don’t see anything that goes beyond the primary online activity rule of “Don’t do anything stupid.”

  • Don’t use a false name when acting on behalf of Dow Jones: That’s just common sense.
  • Base comments on facts and don’t get into partisan political arguments: This makes sense in the same way that employees of any company shouldn’t go around making ridiculous statements about competitors or do anything that’s going to impact the operations of their employers.
  • Don’t recruit friends to promote your work: So basically don’t send “Please re-tweet!” emails to your family. That doesn’t mean people can’t do so of their own volition, just that you shouldn’t raise up an army.
  • Be careful when connecting on social networks with contacts and sources: Again, that’s just common sense. If you’re using someone as an anonymous source but you’ve “friended” that person on Facebook, it’s not hard for third parties to draw the line between the two, defeating the point of them being anonymous.
  • Don’t detail the creation process of an article: This one I’ll actually take issue with. I think, as long as it’s not breaking any journalistic ethical codes, it can be informative to see just how an investigative piece was put together. This goes hand-in-hand with the idea of using the web to publish the full transcript of an article that was excerpted for the article.
  • Don’t disparage the work of competitors: Pretty much common sense.
  • Don’t aggressively promote your own work: Again I’ll take issue with this one. Writers should be the biggest promoters of their own work, publishing it to Twitter, contacting bloggers who cover a similar topic and engaging in other such activities to bring a bigger audience to the piece. As long as it’s done in an above-board manner that doesn’t violate any of the other guidelines above, go for it.
  • Don’t engage in impolite dialogue with critics: In blog-speak this is known as “don’t feed the trolls.”
  • Avoid giving highly-specific advice to site visitors: So don’t specifically recommend a service or anything else. Makes sense.
  • Clear potentially controversial posts with editors: Basically this is an extension of clearing anything else with an editor. Not a big deal.
  • Business and pleasure should not be mixed on Twitter: I’ll disagree with this one as well. Writers should be building up their personal brand through a combination of promoting their professional work and connecting with people around other shared interests. If I get to know a writer on Twitter and can have a casual conversation with them in addition to a professional one I’m more likely to promote their work myself, something that’s good for everyone.

The few points of disagreement I have with the rules are more because I think they are the ones that hamstring unfairly the promotion of the content online. I don’t think any of them violate any sort of social media best practices or increase the secrecy of the media process. I just think they get in the way of writers being able to promote their works to the audience. Those sort of rules and guidelines don’t make sense to me simply because that’s how content is being found on sites like Twitter and other social networks. That sort of content needs to be part of the stream of updates in order to reach the social networking audience.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,426 other followers