Hollywood and Social Media V2.7

From a Wall Street Journal story from earlier this month that I’ve been sitting on since then because I’ve had other things going on:

Hollywood is doing more than using Twitter and Facebook as mere promotional tools. After several years of experimenting, studios have thrown themselves deeply into a medium which is still barely understood. They are now developing elaborate social media campaigns early on, sometimes as soon as a film gets greenlit. Researchers are conducting deep numerical analysis on posts and tweets to guide marketing decisions, sometimes predicting box office revenue with pinpoint accuracy. They’re looking not just at opening movies, but sustaining their word-of-mouth through subsequent weeks. And they are getting more surgical about targeting their ever-fickle, ever-elusive core audience of young people.

Movie marketing has always been something of a black art. Studios typically intensify advertising the month before a movie opens, spending heavily on a barrage of television spots. Upcoming films are now surfacing on social media far earlier. On July 14, nearly a year before the release of M. Night Shyamalan’s “After Earth,” the producers released a video in the form of a Facebook timeline using headlines and photos to describe the historical run-up to an alien-driven apocalypse (the film stars Will Smith).

I’ve yet to see a major movie marketing effort on Twitter or Facebook that I really liked and that was engaging, interesting and enough to make me really tune in to what was going on. Mostly that’s because I have no bandwidth for short-term campaigns, which is what all movie marketing campaigns inherently are.

The story also resurrects the anecdote about how 2009’s Bruno opened big on Friday but then was savaged by immediate (hugely negative) reactions posted to social networks and once again presents this as a case of social media contributing to the sharp drop-off of a movie’s box-office. While there may be some truth there the story fails to adequately point out that this isn’t special, it’s just an example of social media amplifying word of mouth, not some wholly new creation that has to be feared.

Movie Marketing Madness: Shame

Many of us struggle with an addiction of some sort. Whether it’s over-eating or too many chocolate cravings or something far more serious there’s something that draws us and compels us to indulge even if our conscious mind knows that it’s bad for us. For some people that’s sex. And while that is often the subject of jokes and derision it is a real thing and can cause real problems for people.

The new movie from director Steve McQueen is about just that topic. Shame stars Michael Fassbender as Brandon, a New York City professional who lives a closely guarded private life, one that allows him to indulge in and hide his terrible sexual addiction, something that leads him to sleep with an endless string of women. But that routine is disrupted when his sister Sissy (Carey Mulligan) visits him for an extended period of time, something that leads to the collision of his personal problems and the fact that he’s no longer as solitary as his addiction necessitates.

The Posters

The first teaser poster – which oddly turned out to be the only one-sheet released – got more or less straight to the point while also merely hinting at the movie itself. It showed just a bed with wrinkled covers, the title of the film over that image. So we’re clearly into some kinky territory here though the details remain unclear and vague.

The Trailers

The first official trailer for the movie offers a decent look at the themes the story will touch on. It’s all framed around the idea of Fassbender’s character running, which we see him doing in-between shots of him checking out various beautiful women. Then his sister decides to stay with him and things get even weirder. We see him continuing to hit on and make love to various women and his sister is trying to help him overcome what she sees as a problem.

It’s kind of creepy, kind of fascinating and very intriguing. It’s obviously Fassbender’s show here and so it’s going to rise or fall based on whether he can pull the character off, which he likely can. It’s a very good trailer that shows what the film will be about without giving away all the points on the story arc completely.

The second trailer features a lot of the same footage of Fassbender’s character hitting on and then getting it on with a variety of women. But this one has over all that his sister singing “New York, New York” in a plaintive kind of way, something that serves to make what we’re watching just that much more sad and kind of depressing. It’s short – only 90 seconds or so – which means we’re still not getting much of a look but what we do see is kind of fascinating.

A red-band trailer was released just a week or so before release. The core component here is an extended look at the subway sequence that’s shown in the other trailers, showing a bit more of the gaze-filled flirtation that happens between Brandon and the girl he sees there, something that ends with her apparently ditching him. Inbetween that, though, there’s lots of shots of the various kinds of sex that he has with the neverending stream of women he manages to hook up with. The only surprise here is that age-restricted material wasn’t a bigger part of the trailer component of the campaign.

Online

The official website is has a brief Synopsis, profiles of Fassbender, McQueen and Mulligan as well as the two all-ages trailers. That’s all wrapped in a nice interactive display at the top of the page that ties in nicely from a design perspective to the trailers and poster, which is good.

Also there are all the usual Fox Searchlight features: A widget taking you to the studio’s Facebook page, a scrolling box of Twitter updates mentioning the movie, a list of blog posts and news stories about the film and more.

Advertising and Cross-Promotions

Nothing that I saw or was aware of. Because of the NC-17 rating the film wound up earning from the MPAA (more on that below) there would have been severe restrictions placed on its advertising ability, with most all TV/cable stations as well as print outlets have a strict policy on no ads for movies with this rating.

Media and Publicity

The 2011 New York Film Festival marked the movie’s first known public appearance and was heralded as one to definitely see at that event. But before that it debuted at the Telluride Film Festival (Hollywood Reporter, 9/1/11) to generally positive buzz (Los Angeles Times, 9/5/11) though the consensus is that the movie is a tough sit and likely a tough sell to non-festival audiences.

It also appeared at the Toronto Film Festival, where the buzz around it led to a relatively quick acquisition by Fox Searchlight (THR, 9/9/11) and at the Venice International Film Festival, where Fassbender won that festival’s best actor award (LAT, 9/10). It would later go on to appear as one of the most anticipated films at AFI Fest (LAT, 10/18/11)

During the festival period both Fassbender and McQueen talked to the press about the film, with Fassbender labeling the controversial movie a social critique (LAT, 9/12/11)  and McQueen saying he was surprised (LAT, 9/13/11) by the controversy around the movie despite its graphic subject matter.

That subject matter continued to be the focal point the press revolved around as Fox Searchlight declared its intention to release the film as widely as possible regardless of the rating (THR, 10/20/11) just before it was officially given an NC-17 by the MPAA (THR, 10/25/11). Fassbender, at least, came out as being of the opinion (LAT, 11/10/11) that the rating was actually a help to the movie.

Something that got pointed out was that this was one of two movies Fassbender starred in that opened within just a week or so of each other (Time, 11/18/11) and both of which were apparent awards contenders. It was also pointed out that this was the second collaboration between the actor and the director (New York Times, 11/27/11), the first of which was Hunger a couple years ago.

Overall

Whatever your comfort level with the subject matter might be – and there have already been numerous discussions about the movie and how it portrays the nature of sexual relationships – one thing that can’t be denied is that there’s been an effective campaign built up around selling the film. With the two central components being the trailers and the publicity the focus has been put squarely on Fassbender’s performance and a sense of mystery that’s been built up around the movie.

That’s heightened by the fact that the trailers, particularly the two all-ages versions, show much of the same footage but in different ways. Where that usually creates a sense of “uh oh, that might be the only good two minutes there are” here it instead makes the audience wonder why nothing else could be shown. While it’s not likely to set the box office on fire this weekend my guess is that there will be a small contingent that seeks out this movie not based on titillation but on the feeling of this being something truly unique even if it might be largely distasteful.

Movie Marketing Madness: The Artist

Stars can fall just as fast as they rise. The attention span of the celebrity following public is, and always has been, notoriously short. As soon as one star or starlet captures the attention of the public they’re already looking for another that is newer and more exciting to follow. The moment one is found we can’t wait for one of the older ones to fall, to embarrass themselves in some way or to otherwise do something humiliating so we can watch their descent from the limelight with the same fascination we watched their ascent.

The new movie The Artist about just such a cycle. Set in the silent film era (and itself a silent movie, with no dialogue at all) the story follows a dashing romantic leading man George Valentin (Jean Dujardin) who on the red carpet one day encounters a female fan Peppy Miller (Bérénice Bejo) who suddenly captures the attention of the press. She then becomes an actress in her own right, at first riding his coattails and enjoying a great deal of success. But then his fortunes start falling at the same time hers takes off. The movie is a melodrama romance of sorts that, in addition to being silent, is in black-and-whilte in order to heighten the sense that we’re stepping back in time.

The Posters

The first poster featured a wonderfully monochromatic image of the two main characters looking at each other with passion in their eyes. At the top of the poster is an acknowledgement of its Cannes win for Best Actor and at the bottom is the only splash of color to be seen, the red that’s part of the title treatment.

The Trailers

The movie’s first trailer starts off by letting us know we’re in Hollywood in 1927 and shows us Valentin performing for an audience. He has a run in on the red carpet with an adoring female fan and the two become something of a tabloid item, much to the chagrin of his wife. We see the two performing together until there’s obviously some sort of change of fortunes and his star diminishes while hers ascends.

The trailer shows an awful lot of the film’s story arc, basically taking us through the high points of the entire plot. I’m sure there are grace notes that make the film more interesting but we get quite a lot spoiled here I’m guessing.

That being said it shows a movie that’s quite intriguing. If nothing else it makes you want to see whether or not a silent movie can still be pulled off, whether the performances of the actors can overcome the fact that they can’t speak to the audience.

Online

The official website for the movie opens by playing the trailer and, as I often say, it’s well worth rewatching.

After that the first section of content is “About” which has a pretty good Synopsis of the film’s story as well as an About the Production section that goes into multiple areas of how and why the film was made.

“Video” just has the one trailer while “Photos” has by my count 20 stills from the film.

You can learn more about the actors and filmmakers in the “Cast and Crew” section and then read some of the reviews – including links – that have been published about it already, mostly based on festival screenings.

Advertising and Cross-Promotions

There may have been a couple TV spots I saw but that’s about it and I honestly can’t remember if that actually happened or not.

Media and Publicity

The movie first garnered some serious accolades at the 2011 Cannes Film Festival, where it wowed audiences and started some serious word of mouth buzz. But the fact that the industry audience there loved it didn’t necessarily translate into Oscar worthiness (Los Angeles Times, 8/28/11) since the movie had such a starkly different look and feel from anything else out there. It would later also appear at the Telluride Film Festival to additional positive word of mouth, at the Hamptons International Film Festival where it won the Audience Award (Hollywood Reporter, 10/16/11) and at AFI Fest where it was pegged (LAT, 10/18/11) as one of the top films appearing there.

There was also some non-festival press such as this story (New York Times, 10/19/11) that talked about how it sought to recapture the Hollywood of yesteryear and how the movie worked its way through development before finally being picked up by Miramax. Development would continue to be a theme in further stories like this one (LAT, 11/13/11) that talked about bringing the cast on board such a high-concept movie.

Overall

There’s a lot to like about this campaign but the strongest element, and the one on which its success or failure largely depends, is the buzz that came out of festival screenings. If any amount of that can spread beyond those circles and find anyone who wasn’t confused and annoyed by trailers without any dialogue then there could be some level of success for the movie. If not it will go down as another one of those that couldn’t capitalize on early raves, something that’s far too often the case.

Movie Marketing Madness: My Week With Marilyn

These days we think we know the private lives of big stars. With paparazzi taking photos of them whenever they step out for a Slurpee with their kids and countless magazines, blogs and other publications ready to run them and elaborate on what their entire outing was like there seems to be no moment that doesn’t go unexamined. The audience, in large part, enjoys these looks at celebrities because it feeds a need some people have for gossip and what the feel are peeks behind the curtain.

There’s no starlet that did more to further the idea of celebrity press coverage than Marilyn Monroe. She’s the subject of the new movie My Week With Marilyn. With the famous actress played by Michelle Williams, the story takes place during the shooting of The Prince and the Showgirl. Colin Clark (Eddie Radmayne) is assigned to be her personal assistant by Sir Lawrence Olivier (Kenneth Branagh) and the two become close and start up a fling, despite everyone warning him away from the idea. But he’s convinced he’s seen the real, more vulnerable Marilyn and continues to pursue the relationship to the extent he can.

The Posters

The first poster is all about selling Williams and Monroe and so shows her walking amidst a sea of reporters with cameras and notepads while being guided by a young assistant of some sort. She looks kind of aloof and not all that happy with her situation and so it’s about making it clear that Williams isn’t playing Monroe as some sort of clueless ditz but as a genuine human being, something that may not be as sensational but is more promising from an artistic point of view.

A second poster was a nice black-and-white effort that had Williams striking a sexy Monroe-esque pose, just her head and one hand being seen. To the side are a couple of choice quotes about the performances of Williams, Branagh and Dench.

The Trailers

The first trailer starts us off as Marilyn is getting off the plane in England and attending a press conference to promote her appearance there. A young man enters her life as a sort of assistant and the two of them obviously hit it off, with her using him to escape the crush of her regular life. But he’s warned off from her by just about everyone around him, warnings that he ignores since he’s seen her in very unguarded moments.

It’s enormously effective at selling the movie as the kind of awards bait that usually comes out this time of year. It’s got lots of big names playing famous people, something that always goes over well. But it’s also clear those performances are quite compelling, with the actors appearing to really try to inhabit the skins of the actors they’re portraying. This isn’t a full-fledged bio-pic like Chaplin or others but it’s about a single moment in time and so may have more focus for everyone involved because of that.

Online

The movie’s official website opens with some full-screen video of the film’s trailer. After you let that play or skip it you’ll see you can scroll right or left through a series of stills or small video screens that show off most of the main cast. At the top of the screen there’s also a scrolling series of press quotes about the movie complete with the logo of the press outlet they came from though without links to the full stories. That problem is solved, though, in the “Press Accolades” section.

The first section of content is “About” which has a Synopsis that’s pretty well written and which explains the film’s story very well as well as Cast and Filmmaker profiles. There’s also Production Notes here that can be read on the site as well as more extensive ones available as a PDF download.

There are 13 stills in the “Gallery” though none of them can be downloaded. “Videos” has two Trailers (though they seem to be the same one), a behind-the-scenes video and an extended clip.

At the bottom the “Social” area links to the movie’s official Facebook page, which has photos, videos and other updates, and a Twitter profile that has similar updates. Both are just called “Marilyn Monroe,” which is an interesting little bit of sideways selling there.

Advertising and Cross-Promotions

Nothing that I’ve seen either online or on TV. I may have missed something but there hasn’t been any advertising that I’m aware of.

Media and Publicity

While there had been plenty of talk about the movie’s production the first bit of substantive news came when it was announced (Los Angeles Times, 8/4/11) that it would be one of the movies debuting at the 2011 New York Film Festival.

A sizable interview with Williams (Vogue, Oct, 2011) was up next where the actress talked about how she very much wanted to play the part of Monroe and how doing so changed things about how she herself viewed life.

Overall

It’s a pretty small campaign for a movie that I would have expected to have more “oomph” behind it. I’m really surprised there isn’t more a full-throated for a movie that seems to have a number of strong performances, hits a favorite theme (celebrity impersonations) of awards season and is about a person who still causes all sorts of speculation and conversation. I would have thought there’d be much more publicity from the Weinsteins about those performances and more. As it is the marketing itself isn’t bad, just feels small at a time movies like this can’t afford to feel small.

Movie Marketing Madness: Like Crazy

What sort of sacrifices are you willing to make for someone you love? I’m talking romantic love here, not parental or other familial love since those are very different things. I mean the kind of love between two people, the kind that makes you believe you can do anything and has you walking on air much of the day because you know it’s always waiting for you? Even more simply, what would you do to simply be with the person you loved when outside forces were pulling you physically apart?

In the new movie Like Crazy Jacob (Anton Yelchin) and Anna (Felicity Jones) are students together who fall madly, passionately in love. But she’s a British citizen and when she violates the terms of her visa she must go back home, rending asunder their burgeoning love. So the movie not only tracks the beginning of their relationship but also the consequences of her actions and how they must adjust to still being a couple while at the same time having an ocean between them.

The Posters

The poster for the movie features Yelchin and Jones walking along the beach, the sun bleaching out the colors of the image as they do so. At the top are some of the film’s festival credentials and over the picture of the two characters are all sorts of declarations of love that end with the title, which is a nice way to present that. It certainly shows off the main aspect of the film’s story – the relationship between the two of them – and tells the audience clearly what the movie is about.

The Trailers

The first minute or so of the movie’s first trailer plays like a stand-alone version of the montages that are in so many movies that show days in the lives of our two characters as they spend time with each other and continue falling in love. We’re not introduced to them by name, we don’t get narration or anything that explains their situation. We just see them together doing all sorts of things and talking in deep, emotional ways occasionally. While the couple seems very much in love there’s about 25 seconds toward the end that shows things aren’t all deeply held glances. Each one spends time with someone else but even then they don’t seem all that happy.

It’s a charming and low-key trailer. I like it a lot because while, as I stated, the footage plays kind of like a montage from a much cheesier movie it doesn’t fall victim to the cliches of most trailers in that it doesn’t spend a lot of effort trying to set the movie up for the audience. The music that plays over the video fits it perfectly as well.

The second trailer gets a little bit deeper into the story. The first 30 seconds or so of this one are devoted to showing how much they love each other as they begin their relationship, though things shift after he asks if she’s thought about what they’re going to do after they graduate, which is followed shortly about how she’s about to have visa issues. They start trying to have a long-distance relationship but there are obviously problems that continue to cause stress in their relationship. So it’s that stress that leads them to see other people, though the inference with the last bits of footage are that they work around those problems in some manner.

It’s just as good as the first one but for different reasons. Where the first one was all about atmosphere and feeling this one buoys those elements with some character insights that actually make the movie more attractive, I think, as it lays out the story more clearly.

Online

The first section on the movie’s official website is “Videos” and that’s where you can watch both the Theatrical Trailers as well as a TV Spot. The “Gallery” then has eight or nine production stills, most of them featuring the combination of Yelchin and Jones.

“About the Film” has a story synopsis that teases but doesn’t really go deeply into the story as well as Production Notes that are broken up into four parts and which actually feature a much more thorough recap of the film’s plot points.

There are highlights from the careers of the “Cast & Filmmakers” in that section. “Downloads” has two Desktop wallpapers and five AIM Icons you can add to your collections. “Reviews & Accolades” has a list of the film’s festival appearances and wins along with pull quotes from reviews that came out of those screenings, though without links that could take you to the full story.

The “Tell Someone How You Feel” tool prompts you to add a verb to the phrase “I (blank) you #likecrazy” and then push that contribution to Twitter, complete with hashtag.

We begin our transition over to Facebook with the “Poster Creator” feature here. Clicking that takes you to Facebook, where you can select a photo, add some text and create your own version of the movie’s poster which can then be shared with your other friends on that network.

The rest of the Facebook page is filled with Wall posts from fans, photos, videos and other material. There was also a Twitter feed that had similar updates along with plenty of responses to fan questions, which is good to see.

Advertising and Cross-Promotions

Limited advertising was done and I’m not aware of any cross-promotions. There was at least one TV spot created that hit the same notes and was structured in much the same way as the trailer and so works for many of the same reasons even if it is quite a bit shorter.

Media and Publicity

Initially debuting at the 2011 Sundance Film Festival (Los Angeles Times, 1/20/11) it would go on to be one of the festival’s most-buzzed about movies. There it became one of the first movies to get bought for distribution and earned rave reviews for Jones and Yelchin, with the latter doing plenty of interviews (Hollywood Reporter, 1/22/11) about the movie and the improvised nature of the shoot. The movie would go on to win the festival’s Grand Jury Prize (Filmmaker Magazine, 1/29/11). Looking to build off the buzz coming off the fantastic screenings a handful of clips were released in short order that let remote audiences get a taste of what everyone was talking about.

Overall

I like this campaign a lot but wish there had been more of an effort later in the game – meaning any time after July or so – to get it in front of a bigger audience. Things seem to have wound down after the release of the posters and trailers, with no sizable press push (at least not any that I noticed) coming to drive the campaign home in the last couple of months.

But what there is is attractive, consistent and sells the movie I think fairly well. There’s a lot of good stuff here for those in the audience who enjoy hopeless romantic movies, particularly those that feature lots of “realism” and genuine emotion as opposed to sitcomish stunts and other such plot devices.

Movie Marketing Madness: Martha Marcy May Marlene

It’s easy for some people to get caught up in their surroundings. Some people are just more susceptible than others to the influence of crowds around them, the opinions of particularly charismatic individuals and so on. That’s not necessarily a knock against them as individuals – it’s just a truth. Some people are more easily swayed and more likely to fall under the influence of another, particularly if that person is the kind of charming personality that naturally commands respect and pulls people in around them.

The new movie Martha Marcy May Marlene is about just such a susceptible individual. Martha (Elizabeth Olsen) has escaped a cultish enclave run by Patrick (John Hawkes) somewhere and rejoined her family, including Lucy (Sarah Paulson). But her re-assimilation back into the real world is problematic as she struggles to undo the psychological manipulation she’s been subjected to in the cult’s compound.

The Posters

The first two posters were more than just posters. The one-sheets, which were placed in outdoor locations, had QR codes with the faces of Olsen and Hawkes hidden behind them. That’s all that was on the posters but when people scanned those QR codes with their smartphones they unlocked two new trailers.

The final poster then had Olsen lying in bed, her face visible through the transparent “M” that makes up most of the design in the same way it had through the QR code on the previous one-sheet.

The Trailers

The trailer starts with Martha calling someone unsure of where she is and in trouble. From then on in the trailer we flash between the present, with Martha staying with her family and the past when she spent time (for some unknown reason) on a weird cultish the compound in rural New York State where she was indoctrinated into all sorts of strange goings on. Back in the present, though, her behavior is becoming increasingly erratic as the effects of her time on the compound break through and she lashes out against the people she’s living with.

It’s an effective trailer that builds up a sense of mystery and shows it’s the performances of the lead actors that are going to drive the movie. Based on this it’s easy to see where all the Sundance hype was coming from.

The next trailers – which as I mentioned above, Searchlight released by making them available through the QR codes that appeared on posters placed in out-of-home locations – were a mixed pair. One is all about setting the atmosphere, showing the psychological problems Olsen’s character goes through as she struggles against the two identities she has been assigned, one from her family and one from the community that brings her in and manipulates her. The other is mostly about her time in that community and the damage that’s done to her there, both physically and mentally. Both are equally spooky for different reasons but both show clearly that Olsen is the one that carries the film’s story.

Online

The movie’s official website is pretty good. Using the standard Fox Searchlight template there are news updates that you can share across various social networks, a photo album and lists of videos to watch as well as links to the IMDb pages for the actors.

In addition to that site there were two other sites setup that served various purposes. The first, I Am A Teacher and a Leader, is full of trippy visuals that you move through by clicking your mouse on various parts of the screen. There’s not any content there – at least not that I found – but it does give you a sense of the head games being played by characters within the film. The second, Martha Marcy May Marlene Monolith, seems to be tied to the QR code part of the campaign since when you click on different parts of the image that each have one of the two first posters you get the same trailers that were unlocked through those.

Advertising and Cross-Promotions

Surprisingly (at least to me) for a movie this size there was some advertising done on television. Spots were released in late September that worked on the same level as the trailers, showing the basic plot of a young woman running away from something that’s obviously troubling. We see some of what happens to her at the camp and some of her attempts to get back with her family but, of course, not much and just enough to give the basic outlines of the plot.

There was also some online advertising done that primarily used variations on the poster art and other images from the movie.

Media and Publicity

The movie was identified as one of those that were debuting at the 2011 Sundance Film Festival that were likely to breakout of that festival into something bigger and much of the cast and crew were in attendance there. Particularly of note in much of the press generated by that debut was the potentially star-making performance of Elizabeth Olsen (Los Angeles Times, 1/21/11), who appeared to be the “It Girl” of 2011 at Sundance.

Fox Searchlight would pick the movie up for distribution shortly after that Sundance debut, though questions remained as to how to market something like this (LAT, 1/26/11) to the general audience as opposed to the refined festival crowd.

Overall

The single most interesting thing about the campaign is obviously the use of QR codes to drive the campaign forward. It’s not a huge usage of that tool but it’s certainly, at least from my perspective, the most extensive use of them in the service of a movie marketing effort. So that’s interesting in and of itself.

Outside of that the publicity has been primarily about Olsen’s performance in the lead. Based on that positive word of mouth my guess it will attract a decent independent film audience anxious to see what could be a breakout performance from the actress. The rest of the campaign should work to cement that appeal among that audience.

Movie Marketing Madness: Red State

One of the major themes of Kevin Smith’s Chasing Amy (my second favorite Smith flick after Clerks) is that while artists of any sort can certainly do something for money and recognition there’s always the burning desire within them to tell personal stories. And it’s the desire to tell those personal stories that pushes them to do their best work, which it often is. It’s always better to read something an author is excited about, hear a song played live that the band is actually jazzed about playing and watch a film that has some obvious love and passion behind it.

The telling of personal stories has been the hallmark of Smith’s career. With one notable exception where he acted as a director-for-hire (the only occasionally funny and at times nearly unwatchable Cop Out) he’s consistently lived in public through his films. You can basically track his personal life through the stories in his movies – from the directionless time-wasting of Clerks through the dealing with family issues of Jersey Girl to the finally feeling comfortable in your own skin of Clerks 2.

But now he takes a turn once again into a less personal story, though one that’s still be written and created by him. Red State is, in Smith’s own words, something of a religious horror story. A trio of young boys are so eager to have sex they respond to an ad offering just that. But when they get to the rendezvous they are drugged and brought in front of a small passionate preacher and his congregation, held up as examples of the damnation that society is living in. The compound is well fortified and when federal agents are called in to free the boys things get violent quickly as the zealots within seek to defend themselves.

The story is Smith’s way of commenting on the extremes that those fueled by a determined belief that God is always on their side can go to. And just as with his previous film Dogma it’s become something of a lightening rod for this and, as we’ll see, many other reasons.

The Posters

The movie’s first poster is a pretty simple one but it lays out the overall theme pretty well. In the middle of the image is a large cross and in front of that some sort of figure, presumably the Virgin Mary based on Smith’s doctrinal inclinations, covered in a white sheet. But the whole thing looks like we’re seeing it through a shattered and scratched piece of glass, adding a bit to the mystery of what it is we’re looking at.

Other than the title and “Coming 2011″ the only other text is at the top where it says “Fear God” though just how that ties in to any story is left for the viewer to wonder.

A batch of character posters were released by Smith over the course of several weeks, each being given as an exclusive to the movie site that donated the most in a given time to one of a variety of Smith’s favorite charities. Some site owners complained that this was tantamount to paying for materials but I think it was just Smith trying to not only hype his film but also do a little good so I’m inclined to give him a pass on this one.

The posters were pretty simple in nature, just the character against a plain black background, with the description of their character at the top and the same sort of “looking through cracked glass” feel the first teaser had. First was “The Virgin” featuring Kerry Bishe followed by “The Father” with Michael Parks, “Caleb” with Garman, “The Sons” with the three boys who are going to wind up getting in a heap of trouble, “Sarah” with Melissa Leo and “The Sheriff” with Stephen Root.

The next poster was (technically, I guess) a theatrical version. What we see here is Bishe in profile holding an AK-47, her eyes turned upward. The design has the same sort of rough, weathered look the rest of the posters have and promises through that image what’s likely to be at least a somewhat violent film.

There’s also a fair amount of hyperbole here. The poster pegs the movie as being “unlikely” which can be interpreted as simply being that it’s not about a couple of people talking back and forth incessantly. And it labels it as coming from “That Kevin Smith” which is a reference to his Twitter handle.

The Trailers

The first trailer made a somewhat odd debut, with the audio being shared on an episode Smith’s Smodcast podcast.

When that trailer did arrive (on the Smodcast site) it certainly looked unlike anything we’d seen from Smith in the past. All fast cuts and sped-up footage we only got brief glimpses of the characters and scenes as we see shots of anti-gay protesters, people in a church of some sort, gunfire going off around a young girl, someone looking in at a person who’s being kept in a cage and other scenes of incarceration. It’s more than a little disturbing…or at least it hints at the idea that the movie is going to be more than a little disturbing. With all the fast-moving footage and the only dialogue being the preacher singing about having seen Jesus it’s possible only to get an overall tone here and not any great insights. But, as I said, what’s apparent is that we’re looking at a movie that’s so far removed from Smith’s earlier work as to be all but unrecognizable as his.

The trailer was later released in a more official version at the same time the road show kicked off with a new introduction from Smith.

The next trailer (the equivalent of a red-band version) much more clearly explains what the movie’s plot is. We start with three young guys sharing cellphones and talking about some site that hooks people up for random sex, something they’re looking to utilize in order to lose their virginity. When they arrive at the home of the woman they’re supposed to sleep with she insists they have a couple drinks, which they find have been drugged. Soon they find themselves caged and in some sort of small, radical church. They’re subjected to all sorts of torture then as we see the preacher/leader/father of this community spout off about God’s love and so on. Then the federal officials are called in and things get violent as the community defends itself.

It’s a much better trailer than the first since it plays more traditionally and gives more space for the performances to breathe. You get to see what kind of stuff Goodman, Bishe, Parks, Leo and the others are actually doing here and so makes a stronger case for seeing the movie.

Oh – and it labels the film as coming from “@thatkevinsmith,” referencing his prolific Twitter feed.

Online

The CoopersDell.com site (named after the town much of the movie’s action takes place in) is primarily an e-commerce site, with lots of differently sized packages for people to choose from should they want to buy the DVD or other associated material. There’s a lot of stuff available, you just have to decide what you want and at what price point. The site also has information on all the video-on-demand options that are out there.

There’s also the RedStatements site that Smith started after breaking some important news about the movie at Sundance (more on that below). It’s filled with Smith’s long essays on topics related to the movie and what was happening with distribution and so on.

So there’s nothing here that resembles a traditional movie website. But in its place there are sites that allow for people to take immediate action, from buying the movie and its associated swag to connecting with Smith and his opinions. Which is much more interesting and interactive.

Advertising and Cross-Promotions

Nothing here that I’ve seen, but with the amount of publicity Smith has drummed up – only a fraction of which is covered below – who needs an ad buy?

Media and Publicity

Aside from the incessant stream of casting updates and related news stories, along with plenty of talk from Smith himself on his Twitter account, the first bit of real news about the movie came when it began to look like he would be taking it to Cannes 2011, news that still broke via Twitter. That was also where Smith distributed the first photo from the film.

Of course Smith was his own best publicity machine, endlessly updating Twitter about the movie and creating a special sub-section of his ongoing Smodcast podcast series to the film.

As Smith himself had said he was hoping for the, the movie got accepted to the 2011 Sundance Film Festival as an out-of-competition entry. Since the film didn’t have a distributor at the time Smith had said beforehand that he would love to run a live auction after a screening there to get people excited and talking. Of course both of those announcements generated plenty of conversations themselves, which was absolutely the point.

There was some discussion about how this was a different type of horror movie, one that dealt with the psychological damage people inflict on each other as opposed to scenes of gory mutilation.

Smith stirred up quite a few reactions when he announced (again over Twitter) that it was his intention to not to do much of any press glad-handing for the movie (Hollywood Reporter, 12/29/10), instead opting to record an epic-length installment of Smodcast that he said would contain just about everything anyone would want to know about the movie. The move was seemingly prompted by his frustrations with movie news writers and what he felt was their “I’ll just write whatever I want” attitude, something that was cemented with his experience in the wake of Cop Out. His statements prompted much hand-wringing from people who said they would just not cover the movie at all, though how serious such declarations were remained to be seen.

That appearance at Sundance wasn’t without issues, though, as it became the venue for protests by Westboro Baptist Church and those attached to its leader Fred Phelps, who Smith has said is the model for the preacher character in the movie.

Sundance also became the tipping point of another kind for the movie. Instead of holding a full-fledged auction for the movie’s distribution rights, which is what many figured he would do based on his comments, he snapped up the rights himself (THR, 1/23/11) for a mere $20 and then announced he would be distributing it himself.

What Smith outlined in a sprawling 20-minute speech after the screening of the movie was finished was the idea of a road-show, where he would travel with the film to select cities and show it to those who had bought tickets for an event more than just a movie, though he did say he would talk to any interested exhibitor as well and was planning on a formal release later in the fall. But the marketing for the movie would be done almost exclusively through Smith’s own – and owned – outlets such as his podcast, Twitter feed and so on.

The plan was so audacious that it immediately gained both ardent fans and fervent critics. Those acquisition executives who were in the audience felt (somewhat rightly) as if they had been duped since this, according to Smith, was the plan all along. And many industry pundits echoed the thoughts of Patrick Goldstein, who felt this was Smith more or less imploding and giving the entire industry the middle finger.

The analysis of the Sundance incident continued as Smith worked to convince people he wasn’t against the business in general, just that he didn’t think it was working for what he was trying to do. Some came to his defense (Time, 2/3/11) and cited Smith’s filmmaking history (THR, 2/3/11) as a reason why he might want to try going this one on his own.

Things sort of died down until the road show kicked off at Radio City Music Hall, where Smith lived up to his promise of holding a Q&A with each screening as he talked about the movie and whatever else came to mind with some of the cast on stage with him.

Profiles of Smith such as this one (LA Weekly, 4/1/11) continued throughout the screening tour, with the usual themes being how he’s very comfortable in his own skin and with his place in life despite all the attention and speculation that’s circling around him. There were also plenty of interviews with Smith (LAT, 4/7/11) where he continued to talk not only about the film’s themes and story but also about his own future as a filmmaker, with the writer/director insisting that this would be his second-to-last movie before retiring and moving into the next phase of his career as a talk-show host/pontificator of sorts.

The movie was later announced as the opening night feature at Montreal’s Fantasia film festival just before news broke that Lionsgate would be handling (THR, 6/28/11) multi-platform distribution for the movie, though did not include theatrical exhibition, which Smith still retained control over since he wanted to include digital Q&As with the audience as part of any exhibition.

Despite all the hand-wringing up front there was the perception that, regardless of whether or not you like the movie, Smith had fundamentally changed the game in a number of ways by controlling the entire process himself.

Just days before the planned theatrical release (though after the initial VOD release) the movie became available on Netflix for instant streaming viewing, thereby opening it up to a whole new – and much broader – audience group.

Overall

I’d be lying if I didn’t say I liked this campaign a lot. Mostly that’s because, regardless of your opinion of Smith and his movies (he may be one of the few actually polarizing writer/directors out there right now), you have to admire the big brass ones that taking a stand like he’s done requires. He’s so passionate about the movie and believes in it so completely that he’s putting his own money where his mouth is and taking the risks himself, at least for the most part. He sees something that’s broken – the distribution and marketing system most movies go through – saying he wants no part of it and blazing a different path. So he gets a thumbs up from me based solely on that.

The campaign, when viewed through a more traditional lens, does work pretty well even though it’s clearly as divisive as Smith himself. People will either be turned off completely by it or put it on their Must See lists. Indeed some of the reviews that came out of festivals and even VOD watchings have played out just like that.

What will be interesting, though, is that since this is so VOD heavy if Smith has the leverage to finally get public VOD numbers released, something that has to date remained behind lock and key. Only then will we be able to judge whether this campaign winds up succeeding or not.

Movie Marketing Madness: Margaret

How much responsibility do we shoulder for the actions of others? A strict moral code would say that whenever we see someone do something wrong it’s our job to first confront them, ask them to confess their actions and deal with the consequences. But what if, in doing so, we would cause another, equally bad outcome? Does the first point take precedence or should we remain mum under the belief that by being more bold we’re only serving to cause more problems than we solve?

That’s the dilemma faced by the title character in Margaret. Played by Anna Paquin, Margaret one day witnesses a bus driver (Mark Ruffalo) hit a woman and her child in a crosswalk while he’s not paying attention to what’s around him. But when she’s questioned about the accident she says the driver was not at fault. When she considers telling the authorities the truth he pressures her to remain silent because the truth could cost him his job and his family their only means of support. But the burden of keeping the secret starts to impact Margaret’s relationships with the other people in her life.

The movie is finally being released after five or six years on the shelf. Directed by Kenneth Lonergan, who made a big splash with 2002′s You Can Count On Me, the film has floundered in search of a release based largely, according to the press, on Lonergan’s inability and unwillingness to edit the film down to less than three hours. Now, having finally reached a reasonable (as defined by studios) feature length, the film is hitting screens.

The Posters

The movie’s one and only poster simply shows a blurry image of Paquin hustling down a sidewalk, kind of a panicked look in her eye. There’s a bus in the background but I’m honestly not sure if that’s on purpose to tie in to the plot of just a happenstance of design but if you’re hip to the story then that’s a nice touch.

Other than that it’s just the cast list – which is formidable – and the promise that the film comes from the director of You Can Count On Me, which is going to carry a lot of weight with people who still fondly remember that film but won’t have much meaning or appeal for those who don’t.

The Trailers

The one trailer – released just a week or two before the movie hit theaters – tells the story of the film rather well. We meet Margaret as an awkward teen who winds up witnessing an accident where a bus hits a mom and her baby. That naturally messes her up but she’s hesitant to tell anyone the truth because doing so will mean the driver of the bus gets fired. Her grief and problems impact the people around her and even lead her to have some sort of fling with a teacher of hers.

It’s a good trailer that certainly shows what the movie is about, even if what it’s about might be a little uncomfortable in parts. It’s kind of like watching a news reel at times because the actors are all five or six years younger than they are now (more on this below) but that’s not enough to pull you out of the story and, while you can see what the broad strokes are going to be, fans of Lonergan’s previous work will likely have faith that there are lots of grace notes that make the film unique.

Online

While the official website for the film would usually be notable if for no other reason than it came from Fox Searchlight this one shows the rushed nature of the release and the manner in which the studio sees the movie. So there are a couple stories and a Synopsis and a Trailer along with some stills but that’s about it.

Advertising and Cross-Promotions

Nothing here.

Media and Publicity

The movie has been bouncing around unreleased for almost five years, having been completed in 2006. But then a series of disagreements between Lonergan and the studio over the film’s final running time, with the director insisting on a three-hour cut and the studio insisting on a two-hour version. Many directors and editors tried to step in and resolve the dispute, with Martin Scorcese finally coming in to work things out, something that led to a release eventually being scheduled.

Overall

There’s some good stuff here but, as I’ve pointed out a couple times, it’s just not quite as full-throated as you would expect it to be, even from the point of view of a movie that’s presumed to have limited appeal outside fans of certain arthouse films. The trailer is pretty good as is the poster but then the official site is barebones even by independent film standards. And it’s disappointing to see that the publicity efforts didn’t seem to try to pick up the slack a bit. But what is there is pretty good and should appeal to a certain audience, especially those who have been eagerly anticipating another film from Lonergan.

Movie Marketing Madness: 50/50

“Gallows humor” sometimes gets an unfair knock. Someone’s decision to laugh in the face of hardship or even their own mortality is sometimes seen as a sigh that they don’t really get the seriousness of a situation or are making light of something that really shouldn’t be laughed at. Most often reality is far from that, with the decision to laugh at a situation an indicator that they actually *do* understand how serious that situation is but have chosen to bear that burden lightly instead of being weighed down by it.

That ability to laugh at a situation as a way to deal with it is at the core of the new movie 50/50. Written by Will Reiser the movie is more or less about him and the diagnosis of cancer he received while still in his 20s when he was given even odds that he would or would not beat the disease. Starring as Reiser’s stand-in is Joseph Gordon-Levitt, with Seth Rogen playing the friend who helps him deal with this new situation in life. The movie also features Anna Kendrick as Reiser’s comely young therapist who he develops a crush on and the whole thing is basically Reiser working out a good cathartic rage-filled laugh at his life and the situation he found himself in.

The Posters

The first – and only – poster for the movie was basically a repurposed still of a shot that was glimpsed in the trailer released well before this. It shows Gordon-Levitt shaving his head in the mirror while Rogen stands behind him with a slightly weirded-out look on his face. The copy “It takes a pair to beat the odds” is well aware of how clever it is, referring both to the pair of friends that will stick together as one goes through his illness as well as to a portion of the male anatomy that’s usually associated with fortitude and bravery. Pretty simple but nicely done.

The Trailers

When the movie’s first trailer debuted on Apple’s Trailers site it was preceded by an introduction from Rogen, Goldberg and Reiser that explained what the movie was about and what the title meant. Considering the changes that had taken place with that title and the generic nature of what was finally picked this was both funny and useful.

The trailer itself starts out showing Reiser shaving his own head, something he’s doing as a way to cope with his diagnosis of cancer. We see him throughout the trailer try various ways of coming to terms with his situation and deal with it in the best way he can. He’s in therapy with a lovely young therapist and has a friend who’s encouraging him to look on the bright side of his situation.

A blow by blow description of the trailer is kind of pointless since it doesn’t do justice to just how good it is. It’s funny and poignant and gives off a very real and understandable vibe. The interplay between Gordon-Levitt and Rogen is fantastic and while there are some things that you can probably predict about the story based on what’s shown here it also promises a whole lot more in terms of genuine laughs and other emotions.

The second trailer is just as good, showing more of the interplay between Gordon-Levitt and Rogen, most of which is the latter encouraging the former. We get a lot of the same scenes we saw in the first one but they’re rearranged a bit with a few new shots added in. So it winds up working just as well, though in a slightly different way than the first one did because it’s more concerned with some of the relationship comedy and less about the pathos.

Online

The movie’s official website opens with a lot going on right on the front page. There’s a rotating series of images accompanied by quotes from critics behind the trailer that starts playing. Above that is a stream of Twitter updates from people about the movie along with encouragement to use the #beattheodds tag to “join the conversation” about the movie and its story.

The first sort of traditional section is the “Story” where there’s a very nice write up of the film’s plot as well as the story of how it was conceived and written.

“Videos” has both Trailers as well as a clip from the film called the “50/50 Conversation” and a “Cast and Writer Chat” that allows some of the folks involved to talk a little bit about making it.

Finally the “Gallery” has six stills in it featuring the main cast.

There’s also a link below all that to watch restricted clips on YouTube and then one more to find out, using Facebook of course, who you’re go-to friend is.

Speaking of Facebook, the official page for the movie has lots of video and updates about news from the film and questions to the audience about how or when they beat the odds or other things along those lines.

Advertising and Cross-Promotions

TV spots like this one start off by setting up the cancer story but then mostly sold the movie as a Seth Rogen comedy with him reacting to all sorts of situation in big and outrageous ways. It then comes back around to the cancer story but still with heavy Rogen overtones.

Some online advertising was done as well that used the same image of Rogen and Gordon-Levitt as the latter is shaving his head or used headshots of all the main cast members.

Media and Publicity

The movie was included on a list of those that would debut (Los Angeles Times, 7/26/11) at the 2011 Toronto Film Festival.

Much of the pre-release publicity focused on how Reiser was writing what he knew about (LAT, 8/27/11) as he put together the script for the movie and dealt with the problems facing him with the support of Rogen and other friends, who urged him to write about what he was going through.

More press was earned around the time of its Toronto Film Festival debut, where it was one of many films (LAT, 9/7/11) to seek out the refined audience and awards expectations that accompany movies shown there. That strategy seems to have worked, with reports of a standing ovation (LAT 9/12/11) after its first showing.

Overall

I don’t think there’s any question that the best part of the campaign is the trailers. While everything else is still pretty good it’s there that the beats – both dramatic and comedic – really come through. There’s a slight risk that this is being oversold as a Rogen vehicle when that might not be fully the case but since downplaying that angle has been a major effort of the publicity campaign but it’s also something the studio might be counting on to get people in to the theaters.

Movie Marketing Madness: Our Idiot Brother

How we manage the slings and arrows daily life throws at us greatly depends on our overall point of view, the perspective that we hold that we view things through. We can be optimistic, in which case things will almost always appear manageable. Or we can be pessimistic, in which case every new situation is, we’re just sure, going to turn out badly. There are different shades of these two extremes, of course, but when we talk about someone’s general demeanor these are the two categories that are broadly used.

Ned, the character played by Paul Rudd in the new movie Our Idiot Brother, is an eternal optimist. Not the brightest bulb in the room, Ned has bounced through life from one thing to another. After being arrested for selling a little pot Ned is trying to get things back on track and so turns to his three sisters Liz, Natalie and Miranda (played by Emily Mortimer, Zooey Deschenel and Elizabeth Banks respectively) all of whom are at doing different things with their own lives but all of whom fancy themselves more sophisticated and worldly than Ned. But, of course, it’s likely that everyone will have a little to turn from everyone else.

The Posters

The first poster is kind of odd. It looks like a concert poster you’d find stapled to a light pole in 1976, with Rudd’s face in the middle of an orange and yellow designed one-sheet, with his name at the top and those of the actresses at the bottom just below the copy “Everybody has one.” I’m not sure what they’re trying to sell here since this doesn’t do a very good job of playing up Rudd as the central component and gives, outside of that sparse copy, no indication of what the story is about. Just kind of a missed opportunity here.

The second poster was just as odd, telling me that someone has no idea how to sell this movie through a print campaign. It shows Rudd laying in a field of grass with a bemused and naive look on his face, orange Crocs clearly visible on his feet in the background. There’s nothing here again about the movie or anything related to the story and I feel like this is another huge missed chance to convey something – anything – about the overall movie to the audience.

A third poster (never a good sign when a movie like this has this many posters – it shows clearly there’s no clue how to sell the movie) finally puts Rudd in the context of his character’s family. He’s laying sideways on a couch looking very slackerish while the three ladies are sitting next to him looking very proper and serious. It’s the best of the three but that’s not saying very much.

The Trailers

The first trailer for the movie opens with Rudd selling pot to a uniformed police officer, a scenario designed to show just how stupid he really is. That’s followed by him telling his family about the “Tumion” a cross-pollination between a tomato and an onion he’s developing. He’s back to living with his family, specifically his mom but also interacting more with his three sisters, who don’t quite know what to do with him and whose lives he’s constantly getting in the way of.

It’s not terrible but it also doesn’t show anything that might set the movie apart from other kind of amusing comedies. If this really was such a hit at Sundance this trailer doesn’t show exactly why that might have been.

The second trailer was much, much better. It starts out much the same way, with Ned being arrested for, basically, being an idiot and then eventually needing to crash with his various sisters while he tries to sort things out. We see him acting all irresponsible and such and how his behavior impacts the lives of those around him. But then we see more of the redemptive second act, as his family begins to realize that he’s not just a bungling moron who’s out to destroy their lives but a well-meaning person who loves them and loves life even as he bounces from one thing to the next. It’s much more structured and shows off more of what’s to like about the story and the performances and should appeal to a much larger audience.

Online

The official website for the movie opens with some cheery music before giving way to one of the trailers.

Once you get rid of that though there’s some cool stuff there on the main page. If you mouse over one of the pictures on the wall in back of the couch where the characters are sitting you’re prompted to add your photo to the collection by connecting with your Facebook account. And clicking on one of those characters will take you to that actor’s career history and backgrounds. Except for the dog – when you click on him you’re taken to an “interactive” feature that lets you control what the dog does by pushing one of a number of buttons on a little doggie remote control. Kind of cute.

Going back to the navigation menu the first section of content listed there is “About” which just has a Synopsis of the film’s story. “Video” then has both trailers as well as another way to access the Play With the Dog feature. There are 11 stills in the “Photos” section as well as more opportunities for you to add your own portrait via Facebook.

“Cast & Crew” offers you histories on the entire list of major players and creators in addition to whatever you already viewed by clicking through from the front page. You can grab Posters, Desktop Wallpapers and Icons in the “Downloads” area.

Down at the bottom of the page are links to features titled “The Search Begins” and “Photo Booth Tag.” The latter simply takes you to the Albums that are hosted on the movie’s Facebook page (which also has videos, updates on marketing activies and so on) while the former is supposed to let you vote on where Willie Nelson (that’s the dog) should search for Ned next after the two got separated when Ned was arrested. There are a series of videos on the TWC YouTube channel that show the dog’s attempts.

Advertising and Cross-Promotions

Some TV spots were run that focused on the sort of hippie life being led by the none-too-bright Ned. The commercials obviously couldn’t get too deep into the movie’s story but that didn’t seem to be the point as the emphasis is on selling the movie as a variation on the stoner comedy model. A bit of online advertising may have been done as well that featured the poster key art but that’s about it.

Media and Publicity

The movie was first screened at the 2011 Sundance Film Festival, though it had already started generating some chatter prior to that event. At the festival there were plenty of interviews with Rudd, who worried the movie may have come in with expectations that were too high (Los Angeles Times, 1/23/11), Banks talked about working with Rudd (Hollywood Reporter, 1/22/11) and comedy in general and everyone shared their opinions (LAT, 1/23/11) on how it was to work on a movie that seemed to straddle genres like this one does.

Paul Rudd shared some of his own thoughts on potential angles for the movie’s marketing as well.

More seriously there was also a nice story (New York Times, 8/21/11) on how while the movie isn’t autobiographical of the brother/sister team that wrote and directed it their worldview and sensibilities do some out in the characters to a great extent.

Overall

There’s some good stuff here but there’s also a lot of so-so material. The poster component never seems to have fully hit its stride with a string of misfires and even the first trailer did nothing to show the general audience what it was about the movie that festival-goers found so charming. The website is probably the strongest thing here and that’s usually not the case, which unfortunately says something about the rest of the campaign.

Things in general never seemed to come together until close to the end and, honestly, make that Funny of Die video of Rudd’s seem more painfully funny for how accurate it is than anything else. I want to like this campaign since I think the movie is likely quite a bit better than what’s being sold here but if you weren’t tuned in to the festival buzz you probably won’t have that opinion.

PICKING UP THE SPARE